Table 6 Patient/caregiver partner best–worst scaling total counts and scale calculations
Item | Total counts | Scale calculations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Most important | Least important | M − L | sqrt (M/L) | ln (sqrt) | Rescaled | |
A culture of openness and respect for team members’ perspectives and contributions | 88 | 2 | 86 | 6.63 | 1.89 | 1.00 |
Having access to resources to support engagement in KM activities | 51 | 12 | 39 | 2.06 | 0.72 | 0.64 |
Having team members with various types of expertise | 54 | 14 | 40 | 1.96 | 0.67 | 0.62 |
Having a shared goal and commitment to the KM activity among team members | 37 | 13 | 24 | 1.69 | 0.52 | 0.58 |
A collaborative leadership style | 25 | 16 | 9 | 1.25 | 0.22 | 0.48 |
Fit of the KM activity within the context where the activity will be shared/applied | 28 | 22 | 6 | 1.13 | 0.12 | 0.45 |
Access to a network (e.g. patient/caregiver partner, professional, etc.) | 19 | 22 | −3 | 0.93 | −0.07 | 0.39 |
Flexible communication methods within teams | 15 | 43 | −28 | 0.59 | −0.53 | 0.25 |
A flexible implementation plan | 12 | 45 | −33 | 0.52 | −0.66 | 0.21 |
Presence of a “champion” on a KM team | 7 | 80 | −73 | 0.30 | −1.22 | 0.04 |
Personal knowledge of how to lead or participate in KM processes | 5 | 72 | −67 | 0.26 | −1.33 | 0.00 |